The Waterfall model, also known as the waterfall method, is a popular project management approach with high applicability. In this model, the project phases are carried out sequentially, clearly, and follow a strict process.
This article from Base Blog will help businesses understand the Waterfall model, its advantages and disadvantages, and how to effectively apply this model to project management.
What is the Waterfall Model?
Concept
The Waterfall model is a software development approach in which project phases are implemented sequentially, from one step to the next without going back. Each phase must be fully completed before the next phase begins. This helps projects have a clear roadmap and are easy to manage, especially for projects with clear requirements and few changes during execution.
History
The Waterfall model was first introduced by Dr. Winston W. Royce in 1970 in a paper on software development. Although his paper primarily criticized this method, claiming it couldn’t be applied in all situations, it became a foundational model in software development and project management, especially in industries that require high accuracy and minimal changes. Over time, the Waterfall model has been adjusted and applied to many other fields beyond software development, such as construction project management, research, and development.
Phases of the Waterfall Model in Project Management
The Waterfall model is divided into clear, sequential phases, each dependent on the results of the previous phase. These phases help manage projects in a structured and controlled manner. Below are the basic phases of the Waterfall model in project management:
1. Requirement Analysis
The first phase of the Waterfall model is gathering and analyzing all project requirements. All requirements must be defined in detail and clearly. Stakeholders will provide information about objectives, functional and non-functional requirements, as well as quality standards to be met. The goal of this phase is to ensure that all project requirements are documented and well understood.
2. System Design
Once the requirements are defined, the next phase is system design. In this phase, software engineers and the design team will develop detailed designs for the system based on the analyzed requirements. The design will include aspects such as system architecture, databases, user interfaces, and system operation methods.
3. Implementation or Coding
Once the design is complete, programming will begin. In this phase, developers will turn the designs into actual source code. The system’s features and functions will be developed in parts, and each part must be thoroughly tested to ensure it works as designed.
4. Testing
After programming is completed, the system will be thoroughly tested to detect and fix any errors. The testing phase includes various types of testing, such as functional testing, performance testing, and security testing. The goal is to ensure the system works as expected and meets the initial requirements.
5. Deployment
After the system has been tested and bugs fixed, the deployment phase begins. The system will be released into a real environment where end users will interact with it. The deployment process also includes user training and handing over documentation.
6. Maintenance
Although the Waterfall model does not particularly emphasize maintenance, in practice, this phase is crucial. After deployment, the system will need continuous maintenance to fix issues, update software, and improve the system. The maintenance phase ensures the system remains stable and can evolve as requirements change.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Waterfall Model
Advantages
- Clear and Easy to Understand Process: The Waterfall model has a sequential process that is easy to follow, with clear phases and well-defined requirements from the start. This helps team members and stakeholders easily understand and manage project progress.
- Easy Project Management: With the Waterfall model, the project phases are broken down with specific timelines. This makes project management easier, as managers can determine when each phase will be completed and track progress.
- Quality Control: The Waterfall model requires testing and verification after each phase, helping to detect and fix errors early. This ensures the final product’s quality and minimizes issues during system deployment.
- Cost Savings for Unchanging Projects: When the project’s scope and requirements are clearly defined from the outset and there are no major changes during development, the Waterfall model can help save costs and time.
Disadvantages
- Difficulty Changing Requirements During Development: The Waterfall model requires all requirements to be defined and completed upfront. This makes it very difficult and costly to change requirements during development. If requirements change, the project may be delayed or need to be started over.
- High Risk of Late Error Detection: Although the testing phase is important, in the Waterfall model, testing only happens after programming is complete. This can lead to late error detection when many parts of the work are already finished, increasing the cost of fixing them.
- Not Flexible for Complex Projects: For complex projects or those that are subject to frequent changes, the Waterfall model may not be effective due to its lack of flexibility. Small changes in requirements may require revisiting earlier phases, causing delays.
- Not Suitable for Fast-paced Development Environments: The Waterfall model is not suitable for fast-paced software development environments that require quick responses to changes. Software development methods like Agile are more flexible in handling continuous changes in requirements.
- Risk of Late Feedback: In Waterfall, the final product is only visible after all phases are completed. This creates a risk because feedback from users or the detection of critical issues can only be done near the end of the project, which may be too late to make necessary adjustments.
Overall, the Waterfall model is suitable for projects with clear and stable requirements but not ideal for projects that involve continuous changes or require rapid feedback from users.
Conclusion
Above are the details about the Waterfall model. As we can see, Waterfall is truly an intelligent and easily applicable project management method that businesses should not overlook. However, managers must properly assess the nature of the project to apply this model most effectively.
To stay updated on useful knowledge about project management methods and software development, follow Tekup’s website. We are always ready to provide the best technology solutions for your business!